Category: Organisational factors definition

Organisational factors definition

Metrics details. Public health and primary care are distinct sectors within western health care systems.

Organizational factors influencing successful primary care and public health collaboration

Within each sector, work is carried out in the context of organizations, for example, public health units and primary care clinics. Building on a scoping literature review, our study aimed to identify the influencing factors within these organizations that affect the ability of these health care sectors to collaborate with one another in the Canadian context. Relationships between these factors were also explored.

We conducted an interpretive descriptive qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with 74 key informants from three provinces, one each in western, central and eastern Canada, and others representing national organizations, government, or associations. The sample included policy makers, managers, and direct service providers in public health and primary care. While each influencing factor was distinct, the many interactions among these influences are indicative of the complex nature of public health and primary care collaboration.

These results can be useful for those working to set up new or maintain existing collaborations with public health and primary care which may or may not include other organizations. Peer Review reports. Primary care [PC] and public health [PH] are viewed as distinct sectors within the health systems of western societies including Canada [ 1 ]. Canadian researchers propose that better integration between PC and PH is necessary for a more effective primary health care system to improve health and social outcomes [ 2 ].

Other nations have similar aims [ 34 ]. Inin the U. Most discussion papers that promote greater integration and collaboration between PC and PH maintain that the goals of each sector can be supported by the other. PC can act as a source of critical data and clinical observation that can highlight health issues of potential consequence to PH and its mandate to promote health and prevent disease as well as improve population health. PH, through its assessment of community and population health risks and needs can inform PC practitioners of things to look for in their patients, subsequently assisting in differential diagnoses and improved patient care [ 267 ].

Others acknowledge synergies in health promotion that can occur when education within PC settings aimed at behavioural changes to promote health is combined with PH strategies for creating supportive environments that enable healthy life styles and reduce environmental risks [ 8 ].

DeVoe and colleagues [ 9 ] discuss opportunities for PC and PH collaborations to jointly address the social determinants of health. Ina special issue of the journal HealthCare Papers indicated a continuing interest by influential leaders in Canada for building stronger collaboration between PH and PC sectors [ 1011 ]. Various influences that impact collaboration between PC and PH sectors presented within the international literature are discussed within a scoping review [ 12 ].

However, within this discussion there is limited substantive evidence about the important influences on successful PC and PH collaboration, how these influences relate to each other, and the mechanisms occurring within these relationships.

We report here on one of five studies conducted in a program of research [ 13 ] — Strengthening Primary Health Care through Primary Care and Public Health Collaboration. The program of research was guided by an ecological framework [ 14 ] describing three categories of determinants for inter-organizational collaborations including systemic, organizational, and interactional levels. This paper focuses specifically on factors that influence PC and PH collaboration at the organizational level in the Canadian context.

Our results can inform collaboration in countries with similar health care systems. Here, organizational level influences refer to influences at the local or regional level within the context of an organization, large or small. Whereas, systemic level influences are at a national or provincial level such as ministry policies, strategic directions, and funding. Organizational influencing factors can be thought of as operational attributes, processes or conditions within an organization.

organisational factors definition

Our scoping literature review identified five major organizational influences on collaboration between PC and PH [ 12 ]. They included: lack of a common agenda; knowledge and resource limitations; leadership, management and accountability issues; geographic proximity of partners; and shared protocols, tools and information sharing.

No research papers were found in our review that specifically explored influences on PC and PH collaboration. However, we extracted factors from results and discussions of papers reporting on collaboration.

The present study contributes new knowledge by validating our previous review findings and delving deeply into factors explicitly influencing organizational influences on PC and PH collaborations supported by experiences of key informants in PC and PH.

It also explores mechanisms that help to explain relationships between influencing factors. Within Canada, the organizational environment of PC and PH varies depending on the province or territory.Each business is unique and often demands a more adaptive and flexible approach to organizational structure. Read on to find out which organizational factors you should consider when deciding the best organizational structure for your company.

In a competitive environment shaped by evolving organizational considerations, more companies are choosing to give their staff the autonomy and support they need to implement fresh solutions, express greater accountability, and achieve lasting results.

For example, managers and even executives at startups may find it necessary to provide hands-on assistance with basic work responsibilities or other customer-facing duties. Or when facing tight turnarounds, junior employees may need to rely on their own judgment, delegate tasks, or exercise authority without direct approval from above.

Prioritize the ones that are most relevant to your situation when planning or reexamining your team structure. Does your organizational structure make it possible for all your employees to do their jobs and do them well? And is it optimal for its current scale and growth stage?

As companies grow larger, become more established, and add more specialized roles, adding a hierarchical structure with managers and department heads becomes a help rather than a hindrance——it would be overwhelming and inefficient for a general manager or CEO to have hundreds or even thousands of employees report to him or her directly. The way you position your company should also inform your organizational design.

Are you operating in a way that makes that possible? How could your organizational structure and team structure enhance your company objectives? For example, software development is an industry where flexibility and speed of innovation is paramount for staying ahead of the competition.

Cross-functional teams, like Scrum teams, work well in this industry because of the need for rapid iteration that would be stymied if each department worked individually. For companies offering different products or services, each product or service might require very different strategies and thereby result in distinct subdivisions.

We live in a global, digital age. The resources that you decide to centralize or keep in house versus the ones that get localized or outsourced will have repercussions. How will this affect branding? What do you want your employees to think or feel when they come to work and how can your team structure make that happen?

However, a flat hierarchy with very little upper management allows for more genuine collaboration, employee-driven problem solving, and creativity. Some companies push this to having no hierarchy whatsoever, like Menlo Innovations or AgBiometo really stimulate and intensify that collaborative, self-driven spirit in all their employees.

Advances in technology make it easier than ever to track various metrics, collect and analyze information, and communicate with others. How can your company use technology to become more efficient and streamline your organizational structure?

Simpler communication and reporting also makes it possible for managers to oversee more workers, possibly shrinking the number of managerial positions. Additionally, performance tracking means that businesses can invest in the right people and positions that will help them grow and expand.

What factors influence organizational structure vary from company to company. Within the right framework, your employees have the opportunity to realize their own potential—as well as that of your company. Read more. Marie-Reine Pugh works on finding diagramming solutions as a template specialist at Lucid. With a background in English, she is also fairly obsessed with all kinds of writing and storytelling.

She spends her free time perusing books at her local library, watching movies, and baking. What are the factors that influence organizational structure? Company size and development stage Does your organizational structure make it possible for all your employees to do their jobs and do them well?

Learn more. Figured out how to structure your organization? Learn the 5 steps to reorganize now. About the Author Marie-Reine Pugh works on finding diagramming solutions as a template specialist at Lucid.

View the discussion thread.Looks like Javascript is disabled on your browser. AND OR. Add Another. Standard Search Advanced Search.

5 organizational factors to consider when determining team structure

Limit to results with full text. Select All Expand All. Collapse All. Citation Export Print. Javascript must be enabled for narrowing. Results 1 - 1 of 1. Search took: 0. Organisational factors. Their definition and influence on nuclear safety. Final report. Baumont, G. Abstract Abstract. Despite this recognition, however, there are as yet very few methods by which organisational factors can be systematically assessed and improved.

The majority of research efforts applied so far have tended to be modest and scattered. The ORFA project was created as a remedy to these problems.

The objective of the project is to create a better understanding of how organisation and management factors influence nuclear safety. A key scientific objective of the project is to identify components of a theoretical framework, which would help in understanding the relationships between organisational factors and nuclear safety.

Three work packages were planned. First, a review of literature listed out the identified factors and methods for assessing them. Then, a draft version of the present report was prepared to clarify the environment context and the main issues of the topics.

During the seminar views and comments were collected on preliminary results of the project. Finally, this information has been integrated in the present and other reports and will be used to give further guidance to the European Commission in the development of forthcoming research programmes in the field. The project has addressed nuclear safety taking a broad perspective, which reflected and took into account the views of senior NPP management and regulators.

organisational factors definition

The questions discussed during the project have been: how can organisational factors be included in safety assessments, how can good and bad operational practices be identified, which methods can be used for detecting weak signals of deteriorating performance, how should incidents be analysed with respect to organisational factors to give the largest learning benefit, how can data on organisational performance be collected and assessed in a systematic way, how can an organisation be developed in response to changes in its operational environment, what are the needs and priorities for further research work in organisational factors orig.

Country of publication. Descriptors DEI. Descriptors DEC. Publication Year Publication Year. Language Language. Reference Number Reference Number.The organisation function is the immediate logical function after planning. To achieve the objectives set in the plan, somebody should work and should do the right work. The organising function makes the people to work.

The function "involves managers in decisions which result in a system of specialised coordinated jobs. Human and non-human elements will be working.

Job of each worker is specified, control measures are adopted for performing those jobs effectively. An organisational chart depicts tangibly the reporting relationships and channels of communication.

Work flow and accountability are also shown. What factors actually determine the organisation structure? It is grouping activity of men, machine and material for attaining a specific objective. Hence the following factors determine the organisation structure. This is based on four aspects given in the box. Size of the Unit. Size indicates the scale of operation. Normally there are three scales of operation, viz.

Size is an important factor governing cost, efficiency and profitability of a business enterprise. Before any business or non-business enterprise is started, the organisers will have to decide the most profitable and viable size of the unit. Optimum or the best size is a dynamic concept and it changes with the development of science and technology.

Factors for the First Time

Therefore, technology is one factor which determines the size and the organisation structure. To introduce new technology, in business enterprise, the activity has to be expanded and hence the structure changes. The size of the organisation is also determined by the capital employed in the unit. There may be heavy capital outlay but it may be less labour intensive. In such cases the size will be small as authority relation will be less. However, capital outlay is one factor which determines the size of the organisation.

Another important factor which determines the size of the organisation is "men employed. If men employed are less, the size of the organisation will be less and less levels of management and authority relationships. The nature of business unit also determines the size and organisation structure. If it is capital goods industry with huge capital outlay, the organisation structure will be complex in nature.

Consumer goods industries will have more authority relationships in marketing division and less in production and finance line. Thus the nature of activity also determines the organisation structure.What is Organizational Factors 1. Factors that contribute to the success of the information system according to the users.

Find more terms and definitions using our Dictionary Search. Organizational Factors appears in:. Handbook of Research on E-Transformation and Search inside this book for more research materials. Recommend to a Librarian Recommend to a Colleague.

Looking for research materials? Search our database for more Organizational Factors downloadable research papers. Full text search our database oftitles for Organizational Factors to find related research papers. Handbook of Research on Leveraging Risk and The proper understanding and managing of project r In Stock.

Analyzing the Economics of Financial Market The prosperity and stability of any economic struc Utilizing Evidence-Based Lessons Learned for A Systemic Perspective to Managing Complexit Organizational complexity is an unavoidable aspect Global Perspectives on Achieving Success in Competing in both high and low-cost operating envi Servant Leadership: Research and Practice.

Leaders represent a necessary part of any organiza Integrated Operations in the Oil and Gas Ind Today, new skills are required to compete in a glo Payment System Technologies and Functions: I Payment systems are the indispensable infrastructu Electronic Enterprise: Strategy and Architec Enterprise evolution or electronic enterprise isPeople are involved in all aspects of work and keeping them safe should be a priority.

Understanding human and organisational factors — all elements within a workplace that have an impact on the people who work there — is fundamental to keeping people safe. At the core of human and organisational factors are three interrelated areas that are relevant to any task.

These are the:. When managed well, human and organisational factors set workers up for success. Find out what you can do to effectively manage human and organisational factors in your workplace. These are the: job — what people are being asked to do i. Why are they important? Video - Human and organisational factors - Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety Find out what you can do to effectively manage human and organisational factors in your workplace.

Resources and tools Managing human reliability Understanding and managing human reliability and factors shaping human performance. Usable procedures Guidance on developing and writing usable procedures. Training and competence Achieving and maintaining competence through managing training effectively. Staffing and workload Tips for managing workload and maintaining appropriate staffing levels. Organisational change Strategies to effectively implement organisational change. Safety-critical communication Considerations to improve safety-critical communication in the workplace.

Designing for people Designing work tasks, equipment, processes and environment to suit the user. Fitness for work Information on the assessment and management of fitness for work. Health and safety culture Guidance on creating and maintaining a positive health and safety culture.

Maintenance, inspection, and testing error Mitigating the likelihood of human error during maintenance, inspection, and testing activities. Page sub-links Fitness for work Designing for people Health and safety culture Maintenance, inspection, and testing error Safety-critical communication Organisational change Staffing and workload Training and competence Usable procedures Managing human reliability.An organizational structure is a system that outlines how certain activities are directed in order to achieve the goals of an organization.

These activities can include rules, roles, and responsibilities. For example, in a centralized structure, decisions flow from the top down, while in a decentralized structure, decision-making power is distributed among various levels of the organization. Having an organizational structure in place allows companies to remain efficient and focused. Businesses of all shapes and sizes use organizational structures heavily. They define a specific hierarchy within an organization.

A successful organizational structure defines each employee's job and how it fits within the overall system. Put simply, the organizational structure lays out who does what so the company can meet its objectives.

This structuring provides a company with a visual representation of how it is shaped and how it can best move forward in achieving its goals. Organizational structures are normally illustrated in some sort of chart or diagram like a pyramid, where the most powerful members of the organization sit at the top, while those with the least amount of power are at the bottom. For instance, employees may have difficulty knowing to whom they should report.

That can lead to uncertainty as to who is responsible for what in the organization. Having a structure in place can help with efficiency and provide clarity for everyone at every level. That also means each and every department can be more productive, as they are likely to be more focused on energy and time.

organisational factors definition

An organizational structure is either centralized or decentralized. Traditionally, organizations have been structured with centralized leadership and a defined chain of command. The military is an organization famous for its highly centralized structure, with a long and specific hierarchy of superiors and subordinates.

There has been a rise in decentralized organizations, as is the case with many technology startups. This allows companies to remain fast, agile, and adaptable, with almost every employee receiving a high level of personal agency. Four types of common organizational structures are implemented in the real world. The first and most common is a functional structure.

This is also referred to as a bureaucratic organizational structure and breaks up a company based on the specialization of its workforce. Most small-to-medium-sized businesses implement a functional structure. Dividing the firm into departments consisting of marketing, sales, and operations is the act of using a bureaucratic organizational structure.

The second type is common among large companies with many business units. Called the divisional or multidivisional structure, a company that uses this method structures its leadership team based on the products, projects, or subsidiaries they operate.

With thousands of products and lines of business, the company structures itself so each business unit operates as its own company with its own president. Flatarchy, a newer structure, is the third type and is used among many startups. As the name alludes, it flattens the hierarchy and chain of command and gives its employees a lot of autonomy. Companies that use this type of structure have a high speed of implementation.

The fourth and final organizational structure is a matrix structure. It is also the most confusing and the least used. This structure matrixes employees across different superiors, divisions, or departments. An employee working for a matrixed company, for example, may have duties in both sales and customer service. Putting an organizational structure in place can be very beneficial to a company. The structure not only defines a company's hierarchy, but it also allows the firm to lay out the pay structure for its employees.

By putting the organizational structure in place, the firm can decide salary grades and ranges for each position.